<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Decisions on better-edit-tools 文档</title><link>https://conglinyizhi.github.io/better-edit-tools-mcp/en/decisions/</link><description>Recent content in Decisions on better-edit-tools 文档</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><atom:link href="https://conglinyizhi.github.io/better-edit-tools-mcp/en/decisions/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title/><link>https://conglinyizhi.github.io/better-edit-tools-mcp/en/decisions/chip-design/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://conglinyizhi.github.io/better-edit-tools-mcp/en/decisions/chip-design/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="chip-mechanism-design-decisions"&gt;Chip Mechanism Design Decisions&lt;a class="anchor" href="#chip-mechanism-design-decisions"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;h2 id="1-motivation"&gt;1. Motivation&lt;a class="anchor" href="#1-motivation"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the MCP (Model Context Protocol) call chain, tool parameters generated by LLMs often fail due to JSON escaping issues, missing fields, or malformed formatting. Once a failure occurs, the original parameter content may only appear in a one-off error response, making it difficult for the model to reproduce the exact same content in subsequent rounds — especially for large code writes (&lt;code&gt;be-write&lt;/code&gt;) or multi-line replacements.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>